When it comes to cybersecurity, the popular belief that zero trust is only about having strong passwords is just a fallacy. Zero trust involves a wide range of security measures beyond just password strength. Multifactor authentication, behavior monitoring, and network analysis are all key components of zero trust security. These measures work together to ensure that even if a password is compromised, there are other barriers in place to prevent unauthorized access to university systems.
Continuous Monitoring is Key
Continuous monitoring is essential for higher education institutions due to the constant flow of data. By monitoring all network traffic, institutions can quickly identify and mitigate potential security threats. For example, a sudden increase in data sent from the network could indicate a data breach. With multiple access points and various network systems, continuous monitoring is crucial for maintaining security.
DISCOVER: Learn the basics of zero-trust adoption.
Dynamic Security Policies
Implementing zero trust in higher education is an ongoing process that requires vigilance and proactive updates to security policies. Cyber threats and technologies are constantly evolving, so institutions must stay ahead of potential risks by integrating new security technologies. This could involve using advanced intrusion detection systems or AI-based monitoring tools to combat sophisticated attacks.
The Power of Microsegmentation
Microsegmentation partitions a network into smaller segments with distinct security protocols, making it easier to manage access controls. This approach is particularly useful in higher education settings where different departments and user groups require varied access levels. If a breach occurs in one segment, it can be contained, preventing the spread to other parts of the network.
LEARN MORE: Should higher education institutions prioritize security spending?
Addressing Internal Threats
Zero trust isn’t just about external threats—it also focuses on internal risks. By closely monitoring user activities and access to data, institutions can quickly identify unusual behavior. This includes monitoring physical and digital activities within the campus, such as entry to buildings, labs, and data centers, as well as tracking portable storage devices on campus PCs.
Least-Privilege Access
Adopting the least-privilege principle restricts users and devices to only the access they need for their specific roles. This targeted approach enhances security and minimizes risk. Even if a user is compromised, the breach is limited to the systems and data they have access to.
MORE ON EDTECH: What does role-based access control have to do with zero trust?
Zero Trust for All Institutions
Smaller institutions can also achieve robust cybersecurity with zero trust by tailoring the approach to their specific needs. By assessing the institution’s environment and focusing on critical areas, smaller schools can effectively implement zero trust security measures despite limited resources.
The Importance of User Education
Educating everyone on cybersecurity is crucial for maintaining a secure network environment. Training students, faculty, and staff on identifying phishing attempts, following safe computing practices, and reporting security incidents can help prevent breaches. Regular updates on cybersecurity are necessary to keep individuals informed and aligned with zero-trust principles.
Editor’s note: This article was originally published on Feb. 2, 2024.
UP NEXT: Three mistakes institutions often make when implementing zero trust.
